I testbooted 2.6.23-rc2 on my Ultra 1 that has 3 SCSI controllers - builtin, ESP, addon esp+hme and a qlogicpti. The detection lines of both these esp controllers tell about esp0 although they clearly seem to be about different controllers: esp: esp0, regs[1ffe8800000:1ffe8400000] irq[10] esp: esp0 is a FAS100A, 40 MHz (ccf=0), SCSI ID 7 scsi0 : esp esp: esp0, regs[1ff08810000:1ff08800000] irq[14] esp: esp0 is a FASHME, 40 MHz (ccf=0), SCSI ID 7 scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access MAXTOR ATLAS10K4_36SCA DFV0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 3 target0:0:0: Beginning Domain Validation target0:0:0: FAST-10 SCSI 10.0 MB/s ST (100 ns, offset 15) target0:0:0: Domain Validation skipping write tests target0:0:0: Ending Domain Validation scsi 0:0:6:0: CD-ROM TOSHIBA XM-5401TASUN4XCD 2565 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 target0:0:6: Beginning Domain Validation target0:0:6: FAST-5 SCSI 4.2 MB/s ST (236 ns, offset 15) target0:0:6: Domain Validation skipping write tests target0:0:6: Ending Domain Validation scsi1 : esp The second esp0 should be esp1. In the code, esp->host->unique_id is printed there and after printing the unique_id is assigned like that: esp->host->unique_id = instance++; Should it be ++instance instead? -- Meelis Roos (mroos@xxxxxxxx) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
