Re: [PATCH] Sun/Solaris VTOC table corrections

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Mark Fortescue <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:31:16 +0100 (BST)

> This version alows the condition you indicated (VTOC sanity=0,version=0 
> and no_partitions=0) to work as before as long as what were the spare1/spare2
> fields in the VTOC partition entries are zero.
> 
> Can you try it out and see if it behaves correctly for fully set up VTOC 
> and also the previous Linux-Sun partition situation.
> 
> This should at least prevent some posible problems with posible future 
> versions of VTOC. It may be desirable to to reject partitions if the 
> VTOC is not compatible (different sanity or version > 1). What is your view?
> 
> The code will now also scan up to VTOC partitions when a validated VTOC 
> has been detected.

It looks like it would work and I will give it some testing,
thanks Mark.

Why don't we want to try and use 16-partition x86 Solaris labels?
Are those only found as sub-labels of MSDOS partitions?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux