Re: vm changes from linux-2.6.14 to linux-2.6.15

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

I have tracked down a failure to successfully load/run the init task on my Sparcstation 1 clone (SS1) and Sparcstation 2 (SS2), sparc32 sun4c systems, to a patch:

  commit 1a44e149084d772a1bcf4cdbdde8a013a8a1cfde.
  [PATCH] .text page fault SMP scalability optimization

Removing this patch fixes the issue and allows me to use kernels later than v2.5.14. (tested using linux-2.6.20.9).

Given the comment provided by the git bisect, backing out this patch will probably have undesirable conseqnences for other platforms (especially powerpc64) so, if an architecture independent solution is not available, some/all of the code in handle_pte_fault() in mm/memory.c will need be to made architecture dependent.

I am not sufficiently familear with the how the SS1/SS2 mmu works and how the linux memory management system works to understand why this patch prevents my sun4c SS1/SS2 systems from working.

Advice and help on the approch to take and any code changes regarding this issue would be most welcome.

Regards
	Mark Fortescue.

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:

On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 14:02 +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote:
Hi,

Does any one have or know of a good reference that would help me in
identifing the cause of a CPU soft lockup that apears to be related to
changes in the vertual memory handling between these two versions of the
kernel?

Have you tried git bisecting between the two kernels to find the
specific patch that breaks?

~spot


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux