From: Meelis Roos <mroos@xxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:20:54 +0300 (EEST) > I tried todays 2.6.21-rc6+git on Ultra 5 to test out the latest merged > sparc64 changes. Works fine here. > > I have not looked into /proc for some time but now I did. One slightly > strange this is in /proc/interrupts - timer has <NULL> interrupt type: > CPU0 > 0: 9404 <NULL> timer > 1: 0 sun4u SABRE PCIERR > 2: 0 sun4u SABRE UE > 3: 0 sun4u SABRE CE > 4: 0 sun4u power > 5: 339 sun4u sab > 6: 0 sun4u su(kbd) > 7: 0 sun4u su(mouse) > 8: 1 sun4u parport0 > 9: 4 sun4u floppy > 12: 402 sun4u eth0 > 14: 4768 sun4u ide0 > > Is this intentional or rather by accident? Yeah, there is no interrupt controller driving the timer interrupt so there is no "struct irq_chip" hung off of it. I could put some dummy entry there to make the "<NULL>" read something more pleasant :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
