* Andrew Morton (akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:15:39 +0900 Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The problem is that to use hard_smp_processor_id in UP kernels just > > including linux/smp.h does not suffice anymore. Now > > hard_smp_processor_id is architecture specific code and consequently > > asm/smp.h should be included explicitly. > > yeah. The fact that linux/smp.h only exposes asm/smp.h if CONFIG_SMP hits > us again and again and again. It would be good to fix that up, I guess by > including asm/smp.h unconditionally from within linux/smp.h. > > But that's a separate little project. > > > Mathieu, does the (untested) patch below fix this issue? > With this patch, sparc64 builds correctly. Thanks! > I'll test it. > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
