* William Lee Irwin III (wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:26:46 -0800, William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Oh dear. Could we bit a bit more idiomatic here? For instance, > >> something like: > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:29:44AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > Ok I pulled the sparc32 patch back out until there is some > > consensus here :) > > It's just a minor touch-up. If Mathieu is okay with it, I'd rather > leave him as the author and just send along an Acked-by: with it. > I'm not terribly attached to it, either. I just choked on my soda > when I saw set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(fpt), TI_USEDFPU) > etc. go by. (Which reminds me, I really need to figure out how to > consolidate the UP and SMP cases for all this.) > > > -- wli Hello, William's implementation is indeed neater than mine. So the consensus goes to his patch as far as I'm concerned. Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
