Re: Strange kernel messages bootinh 2.6.18.2 on an E4000

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 02:21:15PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> 
> I've built a native gdb64 under Dapper and it works just fine.

Ok; thats a useful datapoint. I'll see what patches they are using.

> 
> A pure-64bit userland on sparc64 is an _incredibly_ _stupid_ idea.

Sniff ;)

> The only thing you'll get is larger binaries, worse performance, and
> maybe 1 or 2 tools which work a slightly better but could be easily
> fixed to work properly as a 32-bit app too.

I don't disagree, but my distro is all built from source, and is a
quick port from the pure 64bit x86_64 version. One glibc and a
non-multilib gcc makes everything _so_ much simpler to build :)

But the "speed" of the distro apps is irrelevant; the peformance
of my custom massively threaded 64bit apps are the only thing that
matters. I've been benchmarking a T1000 to see how it peforms
against the x86_64 kit I am more used to. And I bought a pallet load
of E4500's to play with, since they were almost free :)

Andrew
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux