On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Collins <bcollins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:16:15 -0400
Was this an SMP machine/kernel? If so, it sounds like the scheduler
tuning bug, fixed in the latest kernel (maybe dave knows git sha).
It is on a T1000, SMP is a given :)
I have to apologize for not making it sufficiently clear (and for not
starting a different thread, for that matter), but I was talking about my
experiences with a 2-CPU Ultra60. So, the accurate statement is: a 2.6.17
kernel built with gcc-4.0 failed to boot on it, while gcc-4.1 worked fine.
Once again, sorry for confusion.
Jurij Smakov jurij@xxxxxxxxx
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
