On Sunday 02 July 2006 18:32, David Miller wrote:
> From: Rene Rebe <rene@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 17:14:19 +0200
>
> > Is there any chance the post 2.6.17 sparc64 and tg3 changes make a
> > difference or should I rather really try hard to reprouce it with the
> > 2.6.17.2 kernel to find the real culprit?
>
> 2.6.17.x should be extremely stable and there is nothing
> in the current tree that ought to fix this.
>
> Please retry with gcc-4.0.x, I really want to eliminate
> gcc-4.1.x because that compiler has caused problems for
> other folks. In fact I'm almost hoping it's a gcc-4.1.x
> problem so we can investigate it using this test case and
> fix it :)
Understood. However so far it did not reoccur, still testing
the box under continous high load :-(
Best regards,
--
René Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Germany)
http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rebe.name
+49 (0)30 / 255 897 45
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
