Re: [PATCH] implicit declaration of function `page_cache_release'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 On Sat, Aug 06, David S. Miller wrote:

> From: Olaf Hering <olh@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:01:03 +0200
> 
> > So the patch should be reverted? Its only for CONFIG_SWAP=n, rather
> > unusual for KDE/GNOME tainted workstations...
> 
> Not necessarily, but the header dependencies should be fixed
> up somehow.

I think you are right once again.
(Just the time got a bit out of sync.)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux