On May 11 10:50:14, jn.ml.sxu.88@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 2024-05-10 23:56, Michael Cottle, (David) wrote: > > I need to record specific channels from a multi-channel interface. > I would GUESS that how you do this depends on whether the audio interface(s) > always send all channels of audio, or only those you choose on the inteface > itself. Is anyone aware of an audio interface that lets you choose which channel it sends? I have only seem sound cards that always send everything. > Then the file (or stream) of audio might contain header info saying (to sox) > how many channels of data are being sent. Or it might not in which case you > would HAVE TO TELL sox what is coming in. Again, is anyone aware of a sound interface that sends something else than the raw audio data (as expected)? I haven;t seen anything that would send, say, a wav file. (How would the length possibly be right in the header that comes first, for example?) On May 11 16:47:55, D.Cottle@xxxxxxxx wrote: > We are recording 4 spaces of a music building 24/7 using stereo pairs. Surely you are cutting these at some point (midnight?), chunking the 24/7 into some managable recordings. > Logic is just a shell we use (because it has a nice interface) > to write the CAF files, then we use SoX to split them up every hour. But it's not one endless CAF file, right? So what exactly is Logic Pro writing? > We also use SoX to discard silent files. Does that mean you always record everything, even the silence in the rooms where nothing happens? > The problem is, Logic can be flakey, so we are investigating > SoX as the recording device also. You said you use Logic for its nice interface? In what way is Logic's interfaces nicer that SoX's? > I think I solved my initial issue: > I’m currently experimenting with a Focusrite Clarett > which has 8 analog and 10 digital inputs. > rec test.aif > Records all 18 channels in order. > When I open that in Amadeus Pro it correctly recognizes it > as 9 stereo channels. Whether that is "right" depends of course: if I record 6 channels of drums, 6 of vocals and 6 of the horn section, showing those 18 mono channels as 9 stereo channels isn't "right". > rec -c 2 test.aif > Records the first two channels. > rec -c 8 test.aif > Records the first 8 channels. I believe SoX gets all 18 when reading from the audio device, but only uses the first -c N to create the N-channel output. > I have then successfully used remix to split up the files into > stereo tracks (the end goal). I didn’t think remix could be used > when recording, just with existing files. But I just tried: > rec -c test.aif remix 3 4 > And that recorded just tracks 3 and 4, which was my original question. That is not a valid SoX command line. Do you mean "rec -c 2 test.aif remix 3 4" ? > I then opened two terminal windows and recorded > tracks 1 and 2 using one instance of sox, then 3 and 4 with the other. "Then"? So you missed channels 3 and 4 while recording 1 and 2 - but you want to be recording all of 1-8 all the time, right? > That also worked, which was likewise my original goal. > But now the question is, am I going about it incorrectly > and taxing the system or sox using remix during the recording process? > It is handy to have all the separate CAF files as stereo pairs > (for each room), but would it be more efficient to record all 8 channels > to a single file, then split them up using SoX and remix? Read about remix in the SoX manpage. You simply specify the contributing channels. I would just record 1-8 into one file, with one SoX instance, as that is what you want to have anyway, and split into 1-2, 3-4 etc offline later. Would SoX even have the device available four times simultaneously, if you ran the four instances? You need to write eight channels of audio. I don't think it is more "taxing" to write one 8ch file instead of writing four 2ch files (each discarding 6 channels of input). On the contrary, it is more simple, while the amount of writing work is the same. You might want to look into OpenBSD's superb "sndio" subsystem and its native "aucat" tool, which can split an audio device into subdevices by channels. > I wonder if something like linux's "tee" can make a second copy (on > another disk) of the 8-ch file in parallel with the first. A triviality with https://man.openbsd.org/aucat Jan _______________________________________________ Sox-users mailing list Sox-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users
