Jan Stary <hans@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Jul 01 19:29:23, cloos@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >>>>> "JS" == Jan Stary <hans@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > JS> What Java-Script problem problem are we trying to solve here? > > > > To stay subscribed one has to follow sf's url to a re-confirm page which > > only works w/ js. > > And? I don't see a JS requirement as acceptable for people who rely on command-line applications like sox, and thus cannot run a JS-capable browser. There's also the point where it's proprietary and obfuscated code running on the users' machines. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Sox-users mailing list Sox-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users
