On Jun 26 17:07:31, jonlnichols@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > i have stereo wav files, which each channel is different speakers in a > conversation. trying to figure out how best to split a stereo file by both > its channel and silence, but still know the order the files should be played > in to hear the conversation has a whole. Why do you want to do this? > i don't want to merge the 2 > channels because often 1 channel has more background noise then the other > and sometime speakers will speak over each other and keeping them separate > will make it easier to understand them. You can play the one and then play the other, or just the parts where they speak over each other. > the problem is, for play back sometimes i should play multiple R.###.wav > files in a row, or multi L.###.wav files and i have no way of knowing when i > should do this with my current setup. I you play the L and R files in a sequence (whether one-by-one or with occasional cluster of L or R as you describe), it will not be the conversation that happend, exactly in the places where they spoke over each other. > instead of just having an increment counter for the name, is there a way to > have have it use the starting time( in seconds or whatever) for that segment > of the file? that way i'd have the below files and could just sort by the > number for the play order. First please descdribe _why_ you are doing this. Are the parts when they both speak so uninteligible that you need to separate them into two mono strems to actually hear what each is saying? Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Sox-users mailing list Sox-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users
