Re: Calibrate soundlevels recorded from microphone with data measured from sound meterL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Peter wrote:

> I have to do  a long term meeting of soundlevels. I use a
> condenser microphone  and a cheap soundmeter.
> 
> My plan is frpm one speaker 1 meter from the microphones  send
> sine waves and place the sound meter beside the microphone.
> Record the sound  then adjust the line in level so the in-signal
> is the same as measuered on the soundmeter.

I'm a little bit confused.

Audio is measured with decibels (dB).  It does not matter if it is
sound in the air (dB SPL, or Sound Pressure Level) or in a wire
(dBu where 0 dB is  0.77 VRMS, disregarding impedance loading), or
in a digital system (dB FS where 0 dB is the maximum encodable
level)  

Once you have recorded a reference is should be just simple math.
For example, if the SPL meter shows 80 dB SPL and your recording
is at -15 dB FS, then 0 dB FS will equal 95 dB SPL.  

!!!!   EXCEPT  !!!!

dB SPL measurements are a bit more complex.  There is frequency
filtering (A-weighted, C-weighted), and two time factors (fast,
slow).

This means that if your measured sound is different in frequency,
or different in "crest factor" (average level compared to peak
level) it _will_not_be_accurate_.


> The results from the following measuremt will be 1 minute long
> wav files and a plot from the file.

> So : How do I compare  data from recorded files and calculate the
> correct decibel-levels.?

Plot the recording with a dB scale, and add or subtract the values
you calculated from the test recording.

That is all.

If you want average level, or peak level, or minimum level SoX can
get that for you with stat or stats.

> And why I not use a better sound-meter plugged in to the
> computer, it is becasue they all have to bad range in frequenzy..

dB SPL is supposed to be frequency weighted.  A-weighting and
C-weighting have a different frequency response.  That means that
a dB SPL meter should NOT EVER have a flat frequency response.

Despite all I wrote, I suggest you try it.  If you are wanting
approximate values, not "traceable, suitable for law work", the
results will probably be just fine.

If you want values that can be defended in a court of law, or deal
with legal sound exposure limitations, it probably isn't going to
be accurate enough, but it can still show approximate ranges.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned
dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an
account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and
projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition.
http://sdm.link/oxford
_______________________________________________
Sox-users mailing list
Sox-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux