On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:25:39PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Thanks, Andrew. > > I've merged patch 1 but it's a tricky thing to merge patch 2. Most of these > files come from Sparse and not Smatch. Smatch files basically start with > smatch_, check_ or validation/sm_. So these changes should be sent to > linux-sparse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. There are two problems with me merging this: > > 1) The license for Sparse is MIT and the license for Smatch is GPLv2+. Merging > spelling fixes doesn't really count in terms of copyrights, but I don't > want to deal with that. I'd prefer if it we not mix code with different > licenses and the Sparse code was sent to the Sparse list. > > 2) When I merge updated code from Sparse it causes conflicts because they will > have the wrong spellings and I'll have to fix it up by hand. > > regards, > dan carpenter > Understood, thank you!
