On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 03:37:58PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > Le 26/05/2022 à 14:00, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 01:40:51PM +0200, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > > Le 26/05/2022 à 13:07, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > > > > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:30:05PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > > > > Le 26/05/2022 à 11:51, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > > > > > > > All I know is that it seams to work for me, even if it has not detected any > > > > > > > issue yet :) (compiling takes SO MUCH time on my machine) > > > > > > Yeah. :/ How big is your smatch_db.sqlite file? > > > > > I don't use any up-to-now. > > > > Basically all my changes are targetted at making the smatch_db.sqlite > > > > file smaller so they won't help you. Are you at least doing a parallel > > > > build? The smatch_scripts/test_kernel.sh script does a make -j${NR_CPU}. > > > Yep. > > > > > > I've also tweaked smatch_scripts/kchecker which doesn't have any -j, IIUC. > > Normally, I only use kchecker on one file... The problem with doing > > parallel builds is that you have to print the warnings to a file instead > > of to stdout. > > smatch.txt: > > You can also build a directory like this: > > ~/progs/smatch/devel/smatch_scripts/kchecker drivers/whatever/ > > and up no now, it is mostly the wayIi use it, :) > I guess -j has no downside if you're building a single file. The only problem is that if you're building a directory and sending everything to stdout then the lines can get smooshed together. Is it better to just let them smoosh or build the whole directory and then find -name \*.c.smatch -exec cat \{\} \;? regards, dan carpenter