Powered by Linux
Re: [PATCH] slist: Properly handle one-way merges — Semantic Matching Tool

Re: [PATCH] slist: Properly handle one-way merges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 30, 2016, at 3:16 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> Ah, sorry about that.  I thought we were talking about something else.
> 
> I've pushed the line number change.

Thanks.

I guess it works good enough and in fact probably is more correct than my patch now
that I look at the diff in output with it again.

BTW, speaking of the output, I wonder why is the embedded sparse output is so different from
a stock sparse with smatch?
I tried to also look at the stdout/err output of everything for the script parsing/warning
of the patches in the review system and besides all warnings converted to errors,
a bunch of warnings are totally missing and using standard sparse options cannot enable them.

I am just trying to avoid having a double run of make and resorted to replacing a call to smatch
with a script that calls smatch and then sparse separately, but would be even better if
a single call to smatch would give me both outputs ;)

Thanks.

Bye,
    Oleg--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe smatch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux