[Technical Errata Reported] RFC3665 (6984)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3665,
"Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Basic Call Flow Examples".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6984

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Xiaoxi Li <xiaoxi.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Section: 3.2

Original Text
-------------
   F5 INVITE Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2

   INVITE sip:bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SIP/2.0
   Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1
   Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9
    ;received=192.0.2.101
   Max-Forwards: 69

   F7 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob

   INVITE sip:bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SIP/2.0
   Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1
   Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1
    ;received=192.0.2.111
   Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9
    ;received=192.0.2.101
   Max-Forwards: 68

   F16 ACK Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2

   ACK sip:bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SIP/2.0
   Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1
   Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b76
    ;received=192.0.2.101
   Max-Forwards: 69

   F17 ACK Proxy 2 -> Bob

   ACK sip:bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SIP/2.0
   Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1

   Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1
    ;received=192.0.2.111
   Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b76
    ;received=192.0.2.101
   Max-Forwards: 68
   From: Alice <sip:alice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;tag=9fxced76sl


Corrected Text
--------------
the branch id in the topmost Via header(s) in the F16 F17 messages shouldn't be the same as the via headers added in F5 F7 messages.

the ACK message shall only copy the same branch id in Via if it's for non-200 ok responses. 

this example deviates from the description in RFC 3261 chapter 16.6

Notes
-----
the branch id in the topmost Via header(s) in the F16 F17 messages shouldn't be the same as the via headers added in F5 F7 messages.

the ACK message shall only copy the same branch id in Via if it's for non-200 ok responses. 

this example deviates from the description in RFC 3261 chapter 16.6

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC3665 (draft-ietf-sipping-basic-call-flows-02)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Basic Call Flow Examples
Publication Date    : December 2003
Author(s)           : A. Johnston, S. Donovan, R. Sparks, C. Cunningham, K. Summers
Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Source              : Session Initiation Proposal Investigation
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Announce]     [IETF Discussion]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux