Re: [Sipping] Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Hans Erik van Elburg <ietf.hanserik@xxxxxxxxx>
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:53:17 +0200
>On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Here is my attempt at summarizing the discussion conclusions:
>>
>> Normative things (stated or implied in existing RFCs):
>>
>> - If the UAC sent an offer in the INVITE, then after it receives SDP (the
>> answer) in a reliable response to the INVITE, any SDP in subsequent
>> responses to the INVITE MUST be ignored.
>>
>> - Further, if SDP is received in an unreliable response to the invite prior
>> to receiving SDP in a reliable response, then it MUST be treated as the
>> answer for purposes of media processing, but not for purposes of determining
>> when another offer may be sent or received.
>>
>[HE] I miss what the UAC should do in this case for subsequent
>responses, does the following hold as well:
>"If the UAC sent an offer in the INVITE, then after it receives SDP
>(the answer) in an unreliable response to the INVITE, any SDP in
>subsequent responses to the INVITE MUST be ignored/granted/... ." ?

I agree. And it's certainly "ignored".

>Regardless what the correct behaviour is, it is missing in your summary.
>
>> - if the UAS receives an offer in the INVITE, it MUST NOT include SDP in any
>> response it sends until it has determined the intended answer SDP to the
>> offer.
>>
>> - once the intended answer SDP is determined, it MUST be sent in a reliable
>> response to the INVITE. It MAY be sent in one or more *preceding* unreliable
>> provisional responses.
>>
>> Non-normative, best practice suggestions:
>>
>> - if the UAS receives an offer in the invite, once it has sent the answer in
>> a reliable response, it should not send any SDP in subsequent responses to
>> the INVITE.
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Announce]     [IETF Discussion]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux