I would say yes, the intention is to force an update even if nothing changed. Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Byron Campen > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:00 PM > To: sipping > Subject: draft-niemi-sipping-event-throttle-08 and forcing > notifications when state has not changed > > It appears that the normative language in this draft requires the > notifier to send a notification if the force interval has elapsed, even > when state has not changed since the last notification. Reading over > some past discussion on list, I got the impression that this was not > the intent. So which is it? > > Best regards, > Byron Campen _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
