Re: draft-niemi-sipping-event-throttle-08 and forcing notifications when state has not changed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I would say yes, the intention is to force an update even if nothing
changed.

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Byron Campen
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:00 PM
> To: sipping
> Subject:  draft-niemi-sipping-event-throttle-08 and forcing
> notifications when state has not changed
> 
> 	It appears that the normative language in this draft requires the
> notifier to send a notification if the force interval has elapsed, even
> when state has not changed since the last notification. Reading over
> some past discussion on list, I got the impression that this was not
> the intent. So which is it?
> 
> Best regards,
> Byron Campen

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Announce]     [IETF Discussion]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux