I think I also agree. There are a lot of things that in hindsight we
probably would have done differently. But that is water over the dam. We
are where we are.
Paul
Rockson Li (zhengyli) wrote:
I totally agree with Hadriel's insight here.
It should have been avoided to put too many jobs into PRACK,
I miss KISS(Keep It Simple and Stupid) principle
Regards,
-Rockson
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *Hadriel Kaplan
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:50 PM
*To:* Christer Holmberg; sipping@xxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: PRACK: Change MUST requirement to include SDP
offer in first reliable provisional response
In hindsight I’m thinking we probably also shouldn’t have made the SDP
answer (or another offer) required or even possible in the PRACK
either. I think it should have been for one and only one purpose: to
acknowledge receipt of the provisional response.
-hadriel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
