Re: 回复: RE: early-session & p-early-media /////Re: PRACK: Doesnon-200 response cease re-transmission ofreliable 18x?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, 
>To early session, there is only one dialog, where new early >session SDP comes, old one is replaced according to >rfc3264.You donot need to terminate early dialog by 199 or >something else.>I think early session and forking early media  both have some >disadvantages.>Can you list "the other things" you mentioned to make forking >early media easier than early session?
I meant that 199 can be used for other things.
Regards,
Christer



> 原信息> 主题: RE:  early-session & p-early-media /////Re: > PRACK: Doesnon-200 response cease re-transmission ofreliable 18x?> 发件人: "Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> 日期: 2009/04/06 13:41> > > Hi, > > >IMHO, many implementations do NOT support early-session, In theory > >multiple early dialogs must be supported by UAC, so we can use one > >early dialog for early-media and another one for> final media.> >It looks like a forking or logical forking.> >	 > >But in real world, many device does not support forking or > it can only > >support forking in terms of signaling,not forking to> establish multiple media sessions.> > You have an excellent tool which can help you with that: 199 :)> > When you are done with your early-media, you send 199 in > order to terminate that early dialog. The UAC can then > "switch" to the other dialog.> > This of course requires support of 199 in the UAC, but I > think it's easier to implement that (it is useful also for > other things) than early-session.> > Regards,> > Christer> > > > 	 > 	 > > ________________________________> > 	From: sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx > [mailto:sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of wang.libo@xxxxxxxxxx> 	Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 11:05 AM> 	To: Paul Kyzivat (pkyzivat)> 	Cc: sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx; eric.wangxr@xxxxxxxxx; > sipping@xxxxxxxx; Brett Tate> 	Subject: [Sipping] early-session & p-early-media /////Re: PRACK:> Does non-200 response cease re-transmission ofreliable 18x?> 	> 	> > 	Hi, > 	> 	 We introduce early-session to our system as it can > solve media clip. > 	There are two ways to avoid media clip, early-session > and forking p-early-media. > 	To support them both need all equipments (except > proxies) update, > 	the problems you mentioned exist in both methods. > 	> 	Do you mean, forking early media is better than early-session? > 	> 	Regards, > 	Eric > 	> 	> 	> 	> 	> 	> 	> 	 From the beginning I found the early-session technique > "interesting".> 	The problem I have with it is believing that people > will attempt to > 	implement it, and if they do, that they will implement > it correctly.> 	> 	Given the amount of trouble that people seem to have > implementing the > 	full o/a mechanism correctly, who likely is it that > they will get it > 	right when trying to simultaneously manage two independent o/a > 	negotiations, most likely with the o/a role swapped > between them, and > 	all multiplexed over the same invite. Its possible, but > I'd like to hear > 	about it being tested at sipit.> 	> 	                Thanks,> 	                Paul> 	> 	wang.libo@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:> 	> > 	> Hi,> 	> > 	> Brett Tate has listed some.> 	> Also:> 	>  o. Services can be supplied with fewer messages.It > helps lighten the> 	> servers stress.> 	>  o. You can recognize the session for the tone easily.> 	>  o. It's useful for services such as CF(call > forward),in which case there> 	> may be several early diologs.> 	> > 	> Regards,> 	> Eric> 	> > 	> > 	> > 	> > 	>  > > Do you find some advantage to it over simply > using early media> 	>  > > with a different to-tag?> 	>  >> 	>  > It allows the early media session and answered > media session to be> 	>  > negotiated prior to INVITE 2xx.  The main benefit > is to reduce> 	>  > clipping upon INVITE 2xx if forking has occurred > and all UAS> 	>  > actually support early-session.> 	>  >> 	>  > More specifically, UAS may assume only answered > media will be sent> 	>  > to the port for answer; thus it could quickly > start rendering> 	>  > answered media prior to receiving INVITE 2xx.  UAC > can allocate> 	>  > other ports for early media; or it can refuse or > hold early media> 	>  > without it subsequently delaying answered media > (by requiring> 	>  > another offer/answer exchange).> 	>  >> 	>  > Works good in theory if all user-agents support > it.  I have no idea> 	>  > how well it works in the real world. :)> 	>  >> 	>  > _______________________________________________> 	>  > Sipping mailing list> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping> 	>  > This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP> 	>  > Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions > on current sip> 	>  > Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP> 	> > 	> --------------------------------------------------------> 	> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information > contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's > organization. This mail communication is confidential. > Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and > are not permitted to disclose the contents of this > communication to others.> 	> This email and any files transmitted with it are > confidential and intended solely for the use of the > individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have > received this email in error please notify the originator of > the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of > the individual sender.> 	> This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by > ZTE Anti-Spam system.> 	> > 	> > 	>> --------------------------------------------------------------> ----------> 	> > 	> _______________________________________________> 	> Sipping mailing list> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping> 	> This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP> 	> Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on > current sip> 	> Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP> 	> 	> 	> 	--------------------------------------------------------> 	ZTE Information Security Notice: The information > contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's > organization. This mail communication is confidential. > Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and > are not permitted to disclose the contents of this > communication to others.> 	This email and any files transmitted with it are > confidential and intended solely for the use of the > individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have > received this email in error please notify the originator of > the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of > the individual sender.> 	This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by > ZTE Anti-Spam system.> 	> > > _______________________________________________Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sippingThis list is for NEW development of the application of SIPUse sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sipUse sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Announce]     [IETF Discussion]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux