ter Holmberg <christer.holmberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: =?UTF-8?B?5Zue5aSN77ya?= Re: PRACK: Does non-200 response cease re-transmission ofreliable 18x? Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:27:42 +0800 Message-ID: <vZCLMgPjmvL8.zg4PpSVK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> X-Mailer: EPOC Email Version 2.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: i-default Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable First, services can be supplied with fewer messages.It will lighten the = servers. Then, you can recognize the session for tone easily. This is = helpful for those services such as CF(call forward), in which case there may be = several early diologs. Regards, Eric wang.libo@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Yes. > Early-session has already been implemented in own system. And I think it = do > have some advantage, as both early-session and session can be carried by = > a message, > also,early-session solves media clip. > (P-early-media with different TO-tag is another way.) I guess I'll have to stop saying I don't expect to see early-session implemented by anyone. :-) Do you find some advantage to it over simply using early media with a different to-tag? Thanks, Paul _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
