Christer Holmberg wrote:
Also another question:
Is the flows below valid according to recent arguments?
UAC UAS
|----invite(SDP)--->|
|<--- 183(SDP)------|
|-----prack(SDP)--->|
|<--- 200(SDP)------|
flow 1
Assuming the 200 is the PRACK response, yes.
UAC UAS
|----invite-------->|
|<--- 183-----------|
|-----prack(SDP)--->|
|<--- 200(SDP)------|
flow 2
Not valid. If the INVITE does not contain SDP, a reliable answer must
contain SDP. We are currently discussing whether the FIRST reliable
response must contain SDP, or whether that rule can be related. But,
that is a separate thread.
Hmm. That flow is a consequence of changing that rule that I had not
previously considered.
Allowing flow 2 would cause all sorts of trouble. If the restriction on
offer in first reliable provisional is to be relaxed it must be sure to
state that the first offer must then be in *some* reliable provisional,
and until that is sent there can be no offer sent another way (PRACK or
UPDATE).
Just opening that question is enough to make me more concerned about
relaxing the constraint.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
