答复: RE: 答复: Re: 答复: Re: 答复: Rollback issue: a proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 







I did not mean that.

My thought:

This draft treats "Target refresh" as the obstacle of 4xx. This is the precondition of the draft.




"Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009-03-04 16:15

收件人
<gao.yang2@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gonzalo Camarillo" <gonzalo.camarillo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
抄送
<sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx>, "sipping" <sipping@xxxxxxxx>
主题
RE: [Sipping] 答复: Re:  答复: Re: 答复:  Rollback issue: a proposal






Hi,

I don't think the draft forbids you from using 4xx to re-INVITE, but it explains the disadvantage of doing so if you have committed changes.

Regards,

Christer








________________________________

                From: sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of gao.yang2@xxxxxxxxxx
                Sent: 4. maaliskuuta 2009 10:08
                To: Gonzalo Camarillo
                Cc: sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx; sipping
                Subject: [Sipping] 答复: Re: 答复: Re: 答复: Rollback issue: a proposal
               
               

                I think I explained why I can use 4xx of Re-INVITE, without making anything ambiguously.
               
                The point is that do you agree that later UPDATE/200OK commit the target refresh.
               
               
               
               
                Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

                2009-03-04 15:46

                                 
                                 收件人
                                 gao.yang2@xxxxxxxxxx
                                 抄送
                                 sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx, sipping <sipping@xxxxxxxx>
                                 主题
                                 Re: [Sipping] 答复: Re: 答复:  Rollback issue: a proposal

                                 




                Hi,
               
                > [Gao] I just wanted to say if UPDATE/200OK committed the target refresh,
                > it should be free for 4xx of Re-INVITE.
               
                I insist. You should re-read the draft. It explains why you should not
                use 4xx response to cancel changes. The advantage of the approach in the
                draft is that it does not require normative changes to already
                implemented specs. It is more a BCP kind of spec. That is why its
                backwards compatibility properties are good.
               
                Cheers,
               
                Gonzalo
               
               
               
                --------------------------------------------------------
                ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
                This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
                This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
               



--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Announce]     [IETF Discussion]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux