> -----Original Message----- > From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 4:31 PM > > I think the one of the main issues at the moment is what happens after > preconditions have been met on both sides: > > 1) Is the change now commited/in-use, and a re-INVITE failure would not > change that? <----- "in-use" > alternative > OR > 2) Would a re-INVITE failure cause a fallback (this is what is meant by > "late commitment")? <---- "late > commitment" alternative Ahh. Well if that's the issue, I vote for doing exactly whatever would happen if a normal (non-pre-conditional) SDP offer/answer is exchanged and the re-INVITE fails. I have absolutely no idea what that would be, but it should be the same. :) (I mean I know what 3261 says, that it reverts all the way back, but I have no idea if that's actually what most people do) If I had my druthers the SDP change would stick (not revert), because I personally think it's cleaner, but I can see an argument for both ways. -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
