Re: Summary of Closing the offer/answer rollback issue?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Hadriel,

as I stated in one of the emails in that thread, I will be summarizing the whole thread as soon as I have a minute. I do not expect folks to read and follow the whole thread :o)

Cheers,

Gonzalo

Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
Is there an email in this long thread that summarizes the issues?
It's impossible to follow this thread. :)

I'm not clear on what the issues are with pre-conditions that make failed offers concept break.  To me, pre-conditions are basically not real SDP offers; they're conditional offers.  Until the *all* the conditions are met, it's not "committed".  You continue using the last committed state.  I know there are race conditions, but considering how rare pre-conditions are in the real world (especially in re-Invite's), that I'm having trouble imagining why we should care about corner cases of such.  Regardless, I vote for any fixing that needs to happen because of pre-conditions should be around changing pre-condition logic, even if it means completely re-writing how pre-conditions works - don't change normal SIP or SDP. (not that anyone is proposing it, I just can't tell form this thread)

Re-Invites and SDP offer/answer have so many interop issues in the wild even without pre-conditions, that this whole thread scares me. :(

-hadriel


_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Announce]     [IETF Discussion]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux