Re: 答复: RE: RE: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: Closing the offer/answer rollback issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm still reading this lengthy stream of messages, but I can see point beingmade. It's like the old system of ringing home when you have successfullycompleted a flight, with the understanding that your wife will get the messageof safe arrival but not pick up the phone and get charged for it. So similarlythe two users could agree (with the help of UAs containing hacked software) toexchange SDP, reject the addition of video at the signalling level, then carryon with video anyway.
The service provider obviously has to protect its interests by monitoring themedia streams being exchanged.There's nothing you can do at the SIP level todefend against deliberate violation of the semantics of the protocol.
gao.yang2@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:> I just mean that B can pretend to reject the adding vedio modification > request. But A and B use vedio after the rejecting 4xx.> > That is yhe illegal situation.> > > > > > > "Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > 2009-02-27 18:02> > 收件人> <gao.yang2@xxxxxxxxxx>> 抄送> "Gonzalo Camarillo" <gonzalo.camarillo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <sipping@xxxxxxxx>, > <sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx>, <wang.libo@xxxxxxxxxx>> 主题> RE: RE: Re: ??: Re:  ??: Re:  ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: > Re:  Closing the offer/answer rollback issue> > > > > > >  > Hi,> >> If B do not do so, then A and B can use it illegal. That's what I said > times :)  >  > I am not sure I understand...>  > If B doesn't want to use video, he should remove it (no matter how it is > done). >  > If he doesn't remove it, it will be used, charged for etc. I don't know > what is "illegal" by that. >  > Regards,>  > Christer >  >  > > > > > "Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > 2009-02-27 17:31 > > > 收件人> <wang.libo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gonzalo Camarillo" > <gonzalo.camarillo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > 抄送> <gao.yang2@xxxxxxxxxx>, <sipping@xxxxxxxx>, <sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx> > 主题> RE: Re: ??: Re: [Sipping] ??: Re:  ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: >  Closing the offer/answer rollback issue> > > > > > > > > Hi, >   > If preconditions are met for the video stream, but UE-B then decideds that > he doesn't want to video, an alternative to "late commitment" is for UE-B > to send a new re-INVITE/offer to UE-A and remove the video. >   > Regards, >   > Christer > > > From: wang.libo@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wang.libo@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 11:25 AM> To: Gonzalo Camarillo> Cc: Christer Holmberg; gao.yang2@xxxxxxxxxx; sipping@xxxxxxxx; > sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx> Subject: 答复: Re: ??: Re: [Sipping] ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: > Re: ??: Re: Closing the offer/answer rollback issue> > > Hi Gonzalo Camarillo, > >  If UE-A wants to communicate with UE-B by video, but UE-B only want to > communicate by audio. > and if they uses the new SDP, when pre-conditions met, UE-B will send > his/her videos regardless > of UE-B's willing. >  And if UE-B never send his video although the pre-conditions are met, > then UE-A will be puzzled why > he/she is charged for vedio while receiving NO vedio from UE-B. > >  I think this is a operational problem that we have to solve too. > > regards, > Eric > > > > Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > 2009-02-27 17:10 > > > 收件人> wang.libo@xxxxxxxxxx > 抄送> christer.holmberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gao.yang2@xxxxxxxxxx, sipping@xxxxxxxx, > sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx > 主题> Re: ??: Re: [Sipping] ??: Re:  ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: ??: Re: > Closing the offer/answer rollback issue> > > > > > > > > > > Hi,> >> Also If pre-conditions are met,and re-INVITE fails, UEs could use the >> new SDP.>> This solution will give someone a way to escape charging. >> For example, if UEs use audio at the first time,>> then one of them raise a re-INVITE with a SDP carrying both audio and >> video,>> after the preconditions are met, then the other rejects the re-INVITE,>> but they can communicate with both audio and video after all.> > No, if they negotiate video and the preconditions are met, they will be > charged for video, regardless of what happens with the re-INVITE.> > Cheers,> > Gonzalo> > > --------------------------------------------------------> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is > solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is > confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and > are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to > others.> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of > the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the > individual sender.> This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam > system.> > > --------------------------------------------------------> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is > solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is > confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and > are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to > others.> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of > the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the > individual sender.> This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam > system.> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.> This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------> > _______________________________________________> Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping> This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP> Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip> Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP_______________________________________________Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sippingThis list is for NEW development of the application of SIPUse sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sipUse sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Announce]     [IETF Discussion]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux