I just mean that if one side using Require precondition because of "mandatory" strength-tags, the other side would reject it with 421 while it do not using precondition.
Then the hypothetic situation(by me) is impossible. So, Gonzalo Camarillo is right.
| "Christer Holmberg"
<christer.holmberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
2009-02-27 03:11 |
|
Can you please tell me what 3GPP situation you are refering to?
Regards,
Christer
From: gao.yang2@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gao.yang2@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 4:53 PM
To: Gonzalo Camarillo
Cc: Christer Holmberg; sipping
Subject: 答复: Re: 答复: Re: 答复: Re: 答复: Re: 答复: Re: [Sipping] Closing the offer/answer rollback issue
Dear Gonzalo Camarillo
I remember 3GPP have situation that one side with, other side without.
But I reviewed the RFC:
An offerer MUST include this tag in the
Require header field if the offer contains one or more "mandatory"
strength-tags.
So, you are right :).
But this is not the main branching of our view.
Gao
| Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
2009-02-26 22:40 |
|
Hi,
> If one side without precondition, the other with. It might make
> different view.
this is also impossible. If an offer does not have preconditions, the
answerer cannot add them.
Cheers,
Gonzalo
--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
-------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
_______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
