Geopriv's filter work is expecting throttle to proceed.
RjS
On Feb 25, 2009, at 4:54 PM, DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS wrote:
Sal,
Thanks for updating this draft. We are supportive of it moving forward
as a WG document.
Question: could the throttling request be made by an SBC, which
could be
a single point of failure for Notifies being sent to multiple UEs.
Thanks,
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Salvatore Loreto
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 1:12 PM
To: sipping@xxxxxxxx
Subject: new version niemi-sipping-event-throttle-08
Hi there,
I have submitted a new version of the event-throttle draft
incorporating
WG
feedback from past reviews and ML.
In the meanwhile it will appear on the IETF website here the link:
http://www.sloreto.com/tmp/draft-niemi-sipping-event-throttle-08.txt
cheers
Sal
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
