I also think this will make a difference to the engine of John's draft. We should talk about it. -Charles On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Howdy, > I would like to discuss the draft-kaplan-sipping-pai-responses-00.txt at the next Sipping WG meeting in San Fran, but was asked to spur more discussion on the list. > I believe the draft has the necessary prerequisites for discussion in a WG, namely: > 1) It has beneficial use. > 2) There is running (and deployed) code doing it. > 3) I can't get the main/lone detractor from discussing it in email. > 4) The main detractor is known to attend the IETF in person. > 5) The main detractor has a funny nickname. > > The URL for this draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kaplan-sipping-pai-responses-00.txt > > Any comments/issues/feelings/notions/emotions/emoticons welcomed. > > -hadriel > _______________________________________________ > Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping > This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP > Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip > Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP