From: "Dawes, Peter, VF-Group" <Peter.Dawes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> My preference for combining the drafts is to put everything in the event package draft. Is it viable to define a new SIP header field in an event package description, or would it be clearer to have a completely new draft with a new title? I see no reason why both definitions cannot be in one draft. Which draft name you use for it is probably not significant, since the name will become irrelevant once the draft becomes an RFC. Dale _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
