Please note the appropriate places to discuss SIP security mechanisms
such as authentication of responses is the SIP WG. Discussing
requirements for PAI header field in responses is a fine thing to do
in the SIPPING WG. I have not really looked at draft to see what sort
of category it falls into - I suspect it is more SIPPING that SIP -
but I wanted to provide clarity on where SIP security mechanisms were
currently being done so the authors could choose the right WG.
Cullen <RAI AD>
On Nov 29, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
Howdy,
At the most recent IETF meeting in Minneapolis, we were informed
that a WG decision regarding support for PAI in responses in draft-
ietf-sipping-update-pai had been reached on the mailing list, and
the decision was not to support them. I was instructed to submit a
new draft if I wished to propose any such support. I have now done
so.
A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kaplan-sipping-pai-responses-00.txt
Of course any comments are welcomed and appreciated.
-hadriel
p.s. and thanks to John Elwell for (unknowingly) providing most of
the text for this draft, since it is based on draft-ietf-sipping-
update-pai.
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
