On Jan 27, 2025 Hamza Mahfooz <hamzamahfooz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It is desirable to allow LSM to configure accessibility to io_uring > because it is a coarse yet very simple way to restrict access to it. So, > add an LSM for io_uring_allowed() to guard access to io_uring. > > Cc: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamzamahfooz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 1 + > include/linux/security.h | 5 +++++ > io_uring/io_uring.c | 2 +- > security/security.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > security/selinux/hooks.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > security/selinux/include/classmap.h | 2 +- > 6 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Thanks Hamza, this looks good to me, but we need to wait until we get an ACK from Jens on path 1/2; he's pretty responsive so I don't think we'll have to wait too long. As far as the return/label issue in patch 1/2, as long as there are no other issues, and you are okay with the change, I can fix that up when merging your patches. -- paul-moore.com
