Hi,
since commit d1d991efaf346 ("selinux: Add netlink xperm support") I can't
compile a defconfig:
| $ make defconfig
| $ make security/selinux/nlmsgtab.o
…
| CC security/selinux/nlmsgtab.o
| security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c: In function ‘selinux_nlmsg_lookup’:
| security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c:188:33: error: ‘NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__LOCK’?
| 188 | *perm = NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG;
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| | NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__LOCK
| security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c:188:33: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
| security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c:196:33: error: ‘NETLINK_TCPDIAG_SOCKET__NLMSG’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘NETLINK_TCPDIAG_SOCKET__MAP’?
| 196 | *perm = NETLINK_TCPDIAG_SOCKET__NLMSG;
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| | NETLINK_TCPDIAG_SOCKET__MAP
| security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c:210:33: error: ‘NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__NLMSG’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__MAP’?
| 210 | *perm = NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__NLMSG;
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| | NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__MAP
| security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c:218:33: error: ‘NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__LOCK’?
| 218 | *perm = NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG;
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| | NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__LOCK
| make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:194: security/selinux/nlmsgtab.o] Error 1
…
The commit introducing this is part of v6.13-rc1 and we have v6.13-rc6
and I wonder why am I the only one seeing this? The bots must have
noticed it way earlier and yet I can't find any report of it.
Is this a typo that everyone keeps ignoring or do I lack something that
auto generates this define somewhere?
Sebastian
