Re: [PATCH v2] selinux: add support for xperms in conditional policies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 23:20, Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:27 AM Christian Göttsche
> <cgoettsche@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add support for extended permission rules in conditional policies.
> > Currently the kernel accepts such rules already, but evaluating a
> > security decision will hit a BUG() in
> > services_compute_xperms_decision().  Thus reject extended permission
> > rules in conditional policies for current policy versions.
> >
> > Add a new policy version for this feature.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v2:
> >   rebased onto the netlink xperm patch
> > ---
> >  security/selinux/include/security.h |  3 ++-
> >  security/selinux/ss/avtab.c         | 11 +++++++++--
> >  security/selinux/ss/avtab.h         |  2 +-
> >  security/selinux/ss/conditional.c   |  2 +-
> >  security/selinux/ss/policydb.c      |  5 +++++
> >  security/selinux/ss/services.c      | 12 ++++++++----
> >  6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> This looks fine to me, but I believe there are some outstanding
> userspace issues that need to be resolved?

Hi,

I know it's very late in the development cycle, but I wanted to ask if
there is a chance this could be merged for 6.13?
The userspace patches are merged and currently part of 3.8-rc1, and
these kernel changes are quite simple, since most of the needed
functionality was already in place.
I created a testsuite patch over at
https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux-testsuite/pull/98.

>
> --
> paul-moore.com





[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux