Re: [PATCH] libsepol: check scope permissions refer to valid class

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 2:44 PM Christian Göttsche
<cgoettsche@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Validate that the permission maps in the scope index refer to a valid
> > class datum.  Otherwise since commit 52e5c306 ("libsepol: move
> > unchanged
> > data out of loop") this can lead to a NULL dereference in the class
> > existence check during linking.
> >
> > Reported-by: oss-fuzz (issue 69655)
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c | 8 ++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c
> > b/libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c
> > index 9746f562..0216410c 100644
> > --- a/libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c
> > +++ b/libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c
> > @@ -1467,6 +1467,8 @@ bad:
> >
> >  static int validate_scope_index(sepol_handle_t *handle, const
> > scope_index_t *scope_index, validate_t flavors[])
> >  {
> > +       uint32_t i;
> > +
> >         if (!ebitmap_is_empty(&scope_index->scope[SYM_COMMONS]))
> >                 goto bad;
> >         if (validate_ebitmap(&scope_index->p_classes_scope,
> > &flavors[SYM_CLASSES]))
> > @@ -1483,8 +1485,10 @@ static int validate_scope_index(sepol_handle_t
> > *handle, const scope_index_t *sco
> >                 goto bad;
> >         if (validate_ebitmap(&scope_index->p_cat_scope,
> > &flavors[SYM_CATS]))
> >                 goto bad;
> > -       if (scope_index->class_perms_len > flavors[SYM_CLASSES].nprim)
>
> Since classes should not have gaps, this could be a simple off-by-one,
> cause class_perms_len is 0-based while nprim is 1-based. So
>
>      scope_index->class_perms_len >= flavors[SYM_CLASSES].nprim
>
> might suffice, but I am unable to test currently though.
>

I did some testing and the above does not suffice. In the fuzzer
testcase, nprim = 32 and class_perms_len = 1, but
p_class_val_to_name[0] is NULL.
The patch you sent works.
Thanks,
Jim


> > -               goto bad;
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < scope_index->class_perms_len; i++)
> > +               if (validate_value(i + 1, &flavors[SYM_CLASSES]))
> > +                       goto bad;
> >
> >         return 0;
>





[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux