Re: [RFC PATCH] lsm: fixup the inode xattr capability handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 3:17 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 4:51 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 12:26 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I also need to track down the appropriate commits for the 'Fixes:'
> > > tag(s); I'm not entirely convinced that some of the other patches were
> > > targeting the proper commit ...
> >
> > Looking at this again, I'm not sure we can easily narrow this down to
> > one or two commits as the current flawed situation is really the
> > result of a lot of things.  If I had to pick two may be the addition
> > of the BPF LSM and the introduction of the LSM hook macros?  I think
> > this patch may just get a stable tag without an explicit set of
> > 'Fixes', which should be okay.
>
> I merged this patch, with Casey's ACK and a stable tag, into
> lsm/dev-staging.  Assuming no issues are uncovered during testing, or
> mentioned on-list, I'll plan to merge this into lsm/dev after the
> upcoming merge window closes; I'll send another note when that
> happens.

Quick update to let everyone know that I've just merged this into lsm/dev.

-- 
paul-moore.com





[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux