Re: [PATCH] selinux: pre-allocate the status page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mar 28, 2024 =?UTF-8?q?Christian=20G=C3=B6ttsche?= <cgoettsche@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Since the status page is currently only allocated on first use, the
> sequence number of the initial policyload (i.e. 1) is not stored,
> leading to the observable sequence of 0, 2, 3, 4, ...
> 
> Pre-allocate the status page during the initialization of the selinuxfs,
> so selinux_status_update_policyload() will set the sequence number.
> 
> This brings the status page to return the actual sequence number for the
> initial policy load, which is also observable via the netlink socket.
> I could not find any occurrence where userspace depends on the actual
> value returned by selinux_status_policyload(3), thus the breakage should
> be unnoticed.
> 
> Reported-by: Milos Malik
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/87o7fmua12.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  security/selinux/selinuxfs.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c b/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c
> index 7e9aa5d151b4..ad57b5ad5829 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c
> @@ -2131,6 +2131,7 @@ static int __init init_sel_fs(void)
>  {
>  	struct qstr null_name = QSTR_INIT(NULL_FILE_NAME,
>  					  sizeof(NULL_FILE_NAME)-1);
> +	struct page *status;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if (!selinux_enabled_boot)
> @@ -2163,6 +2164,14 @@ static int __init init_sel_fs(void)
>  		return err;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Pre-allocate the status page, so the sequence number of the initial
> +	 * policy load can be stored.
> +	 */
> +	status = selinux_kernel_status_page();
> +	if (!status)
> +		return -ENOMEM;

Thanks Christian.

I'm not sure we need to fail here, do we?  In the case where we can't
allocate the status page we will simply fall back to allocating it on
the next page read request.  Yes, this will mean that we go back to
missing the initial policy load sequence number of one/1, but that is
hardly reason to take the system down, right?

>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0

--
paul-moore.com




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux