On Jul 28, 2023 =?UTF-8?q?Christian=20G=C3=B6ttsche?= <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Use an unsigned type as loop iterator. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: avoid declarations in init-clauses of for loops > --- > security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c b/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c > index 2ee7b4ed43ef..2f8fab949633 100644 > --- a/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c > +++ b/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c > @@ -153,7 +153,8 @@ static const struct nlmsg_perm nlmsg_audit_perms[] = { > > static int nlmsg_perm(u16 nlmsg_type, u32 *perm, const struct nlmsg_perm *tab, size_t tabsize) > { > - int i, err = -EINVAL; > + u32 i; > + int err = -EINVAL; I understand wanting to make 'i' unsigned, but I think unsigned int is a better fit for an iterator and array index. > for (i = 0; i < tabsize/sizeof(struct nlmsg_perm); i++) > if (nlmsg_type == tab[i].nlmsg_type) { > -- > 2.40.1 -- paul-moore.com