On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 5:36 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 09:17 +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: ... > > Since there is nothing SELinux-specific in these helpers, maybe it > > would be better to move them into <linux/lsm_audit.h> and also convert > > the other users of lsm_network_audit (Smack and AppArmor) to use them. > > (In fact AppArmor already seems to do something similar using its own > > macros.) ... > TL;DR: I would avoid extending the helpers usage at this point. If > there is interest from other other lsm's maintainers, I think such > extension could be a follow-up. I agree. Quite frankly there is a lot of stuff in the LSM common audit code that could be improved. -- paul-moore.com
