Re: [PATCH RFC 19/20] selinux: status: avoid implicit conversions regarding enforcing status

Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> · Tue, 18 Jul 2023 18:01:29 -0400

On Jul  6, 2023 =?UTF-8?q?Christian=20G=C3=B6ttsche?= <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Use the type bool as parameter type in
> selinux_status_update_setenforce().  The related function
> enforcing_enabled() returns the type bool, while the struct
> selinux_kernel_status member enforcing uses an u32.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian GÃ¶ttsche <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  security/selinux/include/security.h | 2 +-
>  security/selinux/selinuxfs.c        | 7 ++++---
>  security/selinux/status.c           | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Merged into selinux/next, thanks.

--
paul-moore.com