On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:56 AM Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:41 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to > > security_inode_init_security(). > > > > Extend the existing ocfs2_initxattrs() to take the > > ocfs2_security_xattr_info structure from fs_info, and populate the > > name/value/len triple with the first xattr provided by LSMs. > > Hi Mark, Joel, Joseph > > some time ago I sent this patch set to switch to the newer > function security_inode_init_security(). Almost all the other parts of > this patch set have been reviewed, and the patch set itself should be > ready to be merged. > > I kindly ask if you could have a look at this patch and give your > Reviewed-by, so that Paul could take the patch set. I've been pushing to clean up some of the LSM interfaces to try and simplify things and remove as many special cases as possible, Roberto's work in this patchset is part of that. I would really appreciate it if the vfs/ocfs2 folks could give patch 2/6 a quick look to make sure you are okay with the changes. I realize that the various end-of-year holidays tend to slow things down a bit, but this patchset has been on the lists for over a month now; if I don't hear anything in the next week or two I'll assume you folks are okay with these patches ... -- paul-moore.com
