Re: secilc genfscon parsing error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/23/2022 9:15 AM, James Carter wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 10:55 AM Matthew Sheets
<masheets@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I am seeing a parsing error from secilc when trying to compile the
following line:
(genfscon sysfs "/zap" file (system_u object_r foo ((s0) (s0))))

But according to the documentation here:
https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux/blob/master/secilc/docs/cil_file_labeling_statements.md#genfscon
I believe this should be a valid line.

The compiler error given is:
Invalid syntax
Bad genfscon declaration at out.cil:129
Failed to build AST
Failed to compile cildb: -1

If I remove the file keyword everything compiles correctly.

Other interesting points of data:

In ref policy there is the following line in selinux.te
genfscon selinuxfs /booleans/ -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:boolean_t,s0)

When compiling this to cil with checkpolicy the following line is produced:
(genfscon selinuxfs "/booleans/" (system_u object_r boolean_t (systemlow
systemlow)))
Which has no reference to the optional file_type field.

CIL did not properly handle the optional file type until a year ago.
The SELinux userspace version 3.4, released last May, would be the
only one that has the fix.
Your rule will work with the latest release.

Thanks,
Jim

Hi Jim,

I pulled the newest master (fb7f35495fbad468d6efa76c5fed727659903038) rebuilt & installed the whole selinux repo and I am seeing the same issue.

I also made the following change:
diff --git a/secilc/test/policy.cil b/secilc/test/policy.cil
index e6b78618..1bcac523 100644
--- a/secilc/test/policy.cil
+++ b/secilc/test/policy.cil
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@
        (portcon tcp 22 system_u_bin_t_l2h)
        (portcon dccp (2048 2096) system_u_bin_t_l2h)
        (portcon sctp (1024 1035) system_u_bin_t_l2h)
-       (genfscon - "/usr/bin" system_u_bin_t_l2h)
+       (genfscon - "/usr/bin" file system_u_bin_t_l2h)
(netifcon eth0 system_u_bin_t_l2h system_u_bin_t_l2h) ;different contexts?
        (fsuse xattr ext3 system_u_bin_t_l2h)

And ran 'make test' in the secilc directory and saw the same error in the previous email.

Is there possibly something else I am missing in my environment?




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux