On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:04 AM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 6:03 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 12:14 AM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > I believe you forgot to modify also > > selinux_netlbl_sctp_assoc_request() in a similar fashion as the other > > functions below? > > Good point. I suspect selinux_netlbl_sctp_assoc_request() will be > greatly simplified too, that will be nice. I'm beginning to think the SELinux/SCTP code is cursed :/ That change brought up some other issues (more of the multiple-associations-on-a-single-socket variety) which I need to think about some more, so I'm putting this on the back-burner for a little bit while I sort out the io_uring and other things which are more straightforward and need to get into linux-next ASAP. -- paul-moore.com
