Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I did provide constructive feedback. My feedback to his problem >> was to address the real problem of bugs in the kernel. > > We've heard from several people who have use cases which require > adding LSM-level access controls and observability to user namespace > creation. This is the problem we are trying to solve here; if you do > not like the approach proposed in this patchset please suggest another > implementation that allows LSMs visibility into user namespace > creation. Please stop, ignoring my feedback, not detailing what problem or problems you are actually trying to be solved, and threatening to merge code into files that I maintain that has the express purpose of breaking my users. You just artificially constrained the problems, so that no other solution is acceptable. On that basis alone I am object to this whole approach to steam roll over me and my code. Eric
