Extended permission and neverallow rules are not permitted in conditional statements. This causes issues on policy optimization where avtab_search() might return a non extended permission rule when searching for one. Found by oss-fuzz (#45327) Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c b/libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c index 735c7a33..72063351 100644 --- a/libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c +++ b/libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ bad: * Functions to validate a kernel policydb */ -static int validate_avtab_key(avtab_key_t *key, validate_t flavors[]) +static int validate_avtab_key(avtab_key_t *key, int conditional, validate_t flavors[]) { if (validate_value(key->source_type, &flavors[SYM_TYPES])) goto bad; @@ -670,13 +670,16 @@ static int validate_avtab_key(avtab_key_t *key, validate_t flavors[]) case AVTAB_ALLOWED: case AVTAB_AUDITALLOW: case AVTAB_AUDITDENY: - case AVTAB_XPERMS_ALLOWED: - case AVTAB_XPERMS_AUDITALLOW: - case AVTAB_XPERMS_DONTAUDIT: case AVTAB_TRANSITION: case AVTAB_MEMBER: case AVTAB_CHANGE: break; + case AVTAB_XPERMS_ALLOWED: + case AVTAB_XPERMS_AUDITALLOW: + case AVTAB_XPERMS_DONTAUDIT: + if (conditional) + goto bad; + break; default: goto bad; } @@ -691,7 +694,7 @@ static int validate_avtab_key_and_datum(avtab_key_t *k, avtab_datum_t *d, void * { validate_t *flavors = (validate_t *)args; - if (validate_avtab_key(k, flavors)) + if (validate_avtab_key(k, 0, flavors)) return -1; if ((k->specified & AVTAB_TYPE) && validate_value(d->data, &flavors[SYM_TYPES])) @@ -716,7 +719,7 @@ static int validate_cond_av_list(sepol_handle_t *handle, cond_av_list_t *cond_av for (; cond_av; cond_av = cond_av->next) { for (avtab_ptr = cond_av->node; avtab_ptr; avtab_ptr = avtab_ptr->next) { - if (validate_avtab_key(&avtab_ptr->key, flavors)) { + if (validate_avtab_key(&avtab_ptr->key, 1, flavors)) { ERR(handle, "Invalid cond av list"); return -1; } @@ -726,7 +729,7 @@ static int validate_cond_av_list(sepol_handle_t *handle, cond_av_list_t *cond_av return 0; } -static int validate_avrules(sepol_handle_t *handle, avrule_t *avrule, validate_t flavors[]) +static int validate_avrules(sepol_handle_t *handle, avrule_t *avrule, int conditional, validate_t flavors[]) { class_perm_node_t *class; @@ -746,14 +749,17 @@ static int validate_avrules(sepol_handle_t *handle, avrule_t *avrule, validate_t case AVRULE_AUDITALLOW: case AVRULE_AUDITDENY: case AVRULE_DONTAUDIT: - case AVRULE_NEVERALLOW: case AVRULE_TRANSITION: case AVRULE_MEMBER: case AVRULE_CHANGE: + break; + case AVRULE_NEVERALLOW: case AVRULE_XPERMS_ALLOWED: case AVRULE_XPERMS_AUDITALLOW: case AVRULE_XPERMS_DONTAUDIT: case AVRULE_XPERMS_NEVERALLOW: + if (conditional) + goto bad; break; default: goto bad; @@ -814,9 +820,9 @@ static int validate_cond_list(sepol_handle_t *handle, cond_list_t *cond, validat goto bad; if (validate_cond_av_list(handle, cond->false_list, flavors)) goto bad; - if (validate_avrules(handle, cond->avtrue_list, flavors)) + if (validate_avrules(handle, cond->avtrue_list, 1, flavors)) goto bad; - if (validate_avrules(handle, cond->avfalse_list, flavors)) + if (validate_avrules(handle, cond->avfalse_list, 1, flavors)) goto bad; if (validate_bool_id_array(handle, cond->bool_ids, cond->nbools, &flavors[SYM_BOOLS])) goto bad; @@ -1098,7 +1104,7 @@ static int validate_avrule_blocks(sepol_handle_t *handle, avrule_block_t *avrule for (decl = avrule_block->branch_list; decl != NULL; decl = decl->next) { if (validate_cond_list(handle, decl->cond_list, flavors)) goto bad; - if (validate_avrules(handle, decl->avrules, flavors)) + if (validate_avrules(handle, decl->avrules, 0, flavors)) goto bad; if (validate_role_trans_rules(handle, decl->role_tr_rules, flavors)) goto bad; -- 2.35.1