On 11/15/21 10:16 AM, Alistair Delva wrote:
Booting to Android userspace on 5.14 or newer triggers the following
SELinux denial:
avc: denied { sys_nice } for comm="init" capability=23
scontext=u:r:init:s0 tcontext=u:r:init:s0 tclass=capability
permissive=0
Init is PID 0 running as root, so it already has CAP_SYS_ADMIN. For
better compatibility with older SEPolicy, check ADMIN before NICE.
Fixes: 9d3a39a5f1e4 ("block: grant IOPRIO_CLASS_RT to CAP_SYS_NICE")
Signed-off-by: Alistair Delva <adelva@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: kernel-team@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.14+
---
v2: added comment requested by Jens
block/ioprio.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/ioprio.c b/block/ioprio.c
index 0e4ff245f2bf..313c14a70bbd 100644
--- a/block/ioprio.c
+++ b/block/ioprio.c
@@ -69,7 +69,14 @@ int ioprio_check_cap(int ioprio)
switch (class) {
case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT:
- if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ /*
+ * Originally this only checked for CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
+ * which was implicitly allowed for pid 0 by security
+ * modules such as SELinux. Make sure we check
+ * CAP_SYS_ADMIN first to avoid a denial/avc for
+ * possibly missing CAP_SYS_NICE permission.
+ */
+ if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE))
return -EPERM;
fallthrough;
/* rt has prio field too */
Are there any other SELinux policies (Fedora?) that need to be verified?
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>