[RFC PATCH 35/35] libsepol: do not create a string list with initial size zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Currently is it implementation defined, due to the size being passed to
calloc(3), whether the operations fails nor not.
Also strs_add() does not handle a size of zero, cause it just multiplies
the size by two.

Use a default size of 1 if 0 is passed and swap the calloc arguments for
consistency.

Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 libsepol/src/kernel_to_common.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libsepol/src/kernel_to_common.c b/libsepol/src/kernel_to_common.c
index 152f2816..9f5400c9 100644
--- a/libsepol/src/kernel_to_common.c
+++ b/libsepol/src/kernel_to_common.c
@@ -107,6 +107,10 @@ int strs_init(struct strs **strs, size_t size)
 {
 	struct strs *new;
 
+	if (size == 0) {
+		size = 1;
+	}
+
 	*strs = NULL;
 
 	new = malloc(sizeof(struct strs));
@@ -115,7 +119,7 @@ int strs_init(struct strs **strs, size_t size)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	new->list = calloc(sizeof(char *), size);
+	new->list = calloc(size, sizeof(char *));
 	if (!new->list) {
 		sepol_log_err("Out of memory");
 		free(new);
-- 
2.33.0




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux