On 5/21/2021 1:19 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 4:32 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Create a new audit record type to contain the subject information
>> when there are multiple security modules that require such data.
>> This record is linked with the same timestamp and serial number
>> using the audit_alloc_local() mechanism.
> The record is linked with the other associated records into a single
> event, it doesn't matter if it gets the timestamp/serial from
> audit_alloc_local() or an existing audit event, e.g. ongoing syscall.
>
>> The record is produced only in cases where there is more than one
>> security module with a process "context".
>> In cases where this record is produced the subj= fields of
>> other records in the audit event will be set to "subj=?".
>>
>> An example of the MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS (1420) record is:
>>
>> type=UNKNOWN[1420]
>> msg=audit(1600880931.832:113)
>> subj_apparmor==unconfined
> It should be just a single "=" in the line above.
>
>> subj_smack=_
>>
>> There will be a subj_$LSM= entry for each security module
>> LSM that supports the secid_to_secctx and secctx_to_secid
>> hooks. The BPF security module implements secid/secctx
>> translation hooks, so it has to be considered to provide a
>> secctx even though it may not actually do so.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: linux-audit@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: rgb@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>> drivers/android/binder.c | 2 +-
>> include/linux/audit.h | 24 ++++++++
>> include/linux/security.h | 16 ++++-
>> include/net/netlabel.h | 3 +-
>> include/net/scm.h | 2 +-
>> include/net/xfrm.h | 13 +++-
>> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 1 +
>> kernel/audit.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>> kernel/audit.h | 3 +
>> kernel/auditfilter.c | 6 +-
>> kernel/auditsc.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>> net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c | 2 +-
>> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 4 +-
>> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c | 2 +-
>> net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c | 2 +-
>> net/netlabel/netlabel_domainhash.c | 4 +-
>> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 24 ++++----
>> net/netlabel/netlabel_user.c | 20 ++++---
>> net/netlabel/netlabel_user.h | 6 +-
>> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 10 ++--
>> net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 20 ++++---
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 7 ++-
>> security/integrity/integrity_audit.c | 6 +-
>> security/security.c | 46 +++++++++-----
>> security/smack/smackfs.c | 3 +-
>> 25 files changed, 274 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
>> index 97cd7471e572..229cd71fbf09 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/audit.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/audit.h
>> @@ -386,6 +395,19 @@ static inline void audit_ptrace(struct task_struct *t)
>> __audit_ptrace(t);
>> }
>>
>> +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_for_lsm(gfp_t gfp)
>> +{
>> + struct audit_context *context = audit_context();
>> +
>> + if (context)
>> + return context;
>> +
>> + if (lsm_multiple_contexts())
>> + return audit_alloc_local(gfp);
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
> See my other comments, but this seems wrong at face value. The
> additional LSM record should happen as part of the existing audit log
> functions.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
>> index 0129400ff6e9..ddab456e93d3 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/security.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
>> @@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ struct lsmblob {
>> #define LSMBLOB_INVALID -1 /* Not a valid LSM slot number */
>> #define LSMBLOB_NEEDED -2 /* Slot requested on initialization */
>> #define LSMBLOB_NOT_NEEDED -3 /* Slot not requested */
>> +#define LSMBLOB_DISPLAY -4 /* Use the "display" slot */
>> +#define LSMBLOB_FIRST -5 /* Use the default "display" slot */
>>
>> /**
>> * lsmblob_init - initialize an lsmblob structure
>> @@ -248,6 +250,15 @@ static inline u32 lsmblob_value(const struct lsmblob *blob)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool lsm_multiple_contexts(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
>> + return lsm_slot_to_name(1) != NULL;
>> +#else
>> + return false;
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>> /* These functions are in security/commoncap.c */
>> extern int cap_capable(const struct cred *cred, struct user_namespace *ns,
>> int cap, unsigned int opts);
>> @@ -578,7 +589,8 @@ int security_setprocattr(const char *lsm, const char *name, void *value,
>> size_t size);
>> int security_netlink_send(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
>> int security_ismaclabel(const char *name);
>> -int security_secid_to_secctx(struct lsmblob *blob, struct lsmcontext *cp);
>> +int security_secid_to_secctx(struct lsmblob *blob, struct lsmcontext *cp,
>> + int display);
>> int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen,
>> struct lsmblob *blob);
>> void security_release_secctx(struct lsmcontext *cp);
>> @@ -1433,7 +1445,7 @@ static inline int security_ismaclabel(const char *name)
>> }
>>
>> static inline int security_secid_to_secctx(struct lsmblob *blob,
>> - struct lsmcontext *cp)
>> + struct lsmcontext *cp, int display)
>> {
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>> diff --git a/include/net/netlabel.h b/include/net/netlabel.h
>> index 73fc25b4042b..9bc1f969a25d 100644
>> --- a/include/net/netlabel.h
>> +++ b/include/net/netlabel.h
>> @@ -97,7 +97,8 @@ struct calipso_doi;
>>
>> /* NetLabel audit information */
>> struct netlbl_audit {
>> - u32 secid;
>> + struct audit_context *localcontext;
>> + struct lsmblob lsmdata;
>> kuid_t loginuid;
>> unsigned int sessionid;
>> };
>> diff --git a/include/net/scm.h b/include/net/scm.h
>> index b77a52f93389..f4d567d4885e 100644
>> --- a/include/net/scm.h
>> +++ b/include/net/scm.h
>> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static inline void scm_passec(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, struct sc
>> * and the infrastructure will know which it is.
>> */
>> lsmblob_init(&lb, scm->secid);
>> - err = security_secid_to_secctx(&lb, &context);
>> + err = security_secid_to_secctx(&lb, &context, LSMBLOB_DISPLAY);
>>
>> if (!err) {
>> put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SCM_SECURITY, context.len,
>> diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
>> index c58a6d4eb610..f8ad20d34498 100644
>> --- a/include/net/xfrm.h
>> +++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
>> @@ -669,13 +669,22 @@ struct xfrm_spi_skb_cb {
>> #define XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(__skb) ((struct xfrm_spi_skb_cb *)&((__skb)->cb[0]))
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
>> -static inline struct audit_buffer *xfrm_audit_start(const char *op)
>> +static inline struct audit_buffer *xfrm_audit_start(const char *op,
>> + struct audit_context **lac)
>> {
>> + struct audit_context *context;
>> struct audit_buffer *audit_buf = NULL;
>>
>> if (audit_enabled == AUDIT_OFF)
>> return NULL;
>> - audit_buf = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_ATOMIC,
>> + context = audit_context();
>> + if (lac != NULL) {
>> + if (lsm_multiple_contexts() && context == NULL)
>> + context = audit_alloc_local(GFP_ATOMIC);
>> + *lac = context;
>> + }
> Okay, we've got a disconnect here regarding "audit contexts" and
> "local contexts", skip down below where I attempt to explain things a
> little more but basically if there is a place that uses this pattern:
>
> audit_log_start(audit_context(), ...);
>
> ... you don't need, or want, a "local context". You might need a
> local context if you see the following pattern:
>
> audit_log_start(NULL, ...);
>
> The "local context" idea is a hack and should be avoided whenever
> possible; if you have an existing audit context from a syscall, or
> something else, you *really* should use it ... or have a *really* good
> explanation as to why you can not.
>
>> + audit_buf = audit_log_start(context, GFP_ATOMIC,
>> AUDIT_MAC_IPSEC_EVENT);
>> if (audit_buf == NULL)
>> return NULL;
>> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
>> index 841123390d41..60c027d7759c 100644
>> --- a/kernel/audit.c
>> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
>> @@ -386,10 +386,12 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
>> static int audit_log_config_change(char *function_name, u32 new, u32 old,
>> int allow_changes)
>> {
>> + struct audit_context *context;
>> struct audit_buffer *ab;
>> int rc = 0;
>>
>> - ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE);
>> + context = audit_alloc_for_lsm(GFP_KERNEL);
>> + ab = audit_log_start(context, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE);
> Use the existing context, don't create your own, it breaks the record
> associations in the audit event stream.
>
>> if (unlikely(!ab))
>> return rc;
>> audit_log_format(ab, "op=set %s=%u old=%u ", function_name, new, old);
>> @@ -398,7 +400,7 @@ static int audit_log_config_change(char *function_name, u32 new, u32 old,
>> if (rc)
>> allow_changes = 0; /* Something weird, deny request */
>> audit_log_format(ab, " res=%d", allow_changes);
>> - audit_log_end(ab);
>> + audit_log_end_local(ab, context);
> More on this below, but we really should just use audit_log_end(),
> "local contexts" are not special, the are regular audit contexts ...
> although if they are used properly (limited scope) you do need to free
> them when you are done.
>
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1357,7 +1355,8 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
>> if (err)
>> break;
>> }
>> - audit_log_user_recv_msg(&ab, msg_type);
>> + lcontext = audit_alloc_for_lsm(GFP_KERNEL);
>> + audit_log_common_recv_msg(lcontext, &ab, msg_type);
> Same.
>
>> if (msg_type != AUDIT_USER_TTY) {
>> /* ensure NULL termination */
>> str[data_len - 1] = '\0';
>> @@ -1370,7 +1369,7 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
>> data_len--;
>> audit_log_n_untrustedstring(ab, str, data_len);
>> }
>> - audit_log_end(ab);
>> + audit_log_end_local(ab, lcontext);
> Same.
>
>> }
>> break;
>> case AUDIT_ADD_RULE:
>> @@ -1378,13 +1377,14 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
>> if (data_len < sizeof(struct audit_rule_data))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> if (audit_enabled == AUDIT_LOCKED) {
>> - audit_log_common_recv_msg(audit_context(), &ab,
>> + lcontext = audit_alloc_for_lsm(GFP_KERNEL);
>> + audit_log_common_recv_msg(lcontext, &ab,
>> AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE);
>> audit_log_format(ab, " op=%s audit_enabled=%d res=0",
>> msg_type == AUDIT_ADD_RULE ?
>> "add_rule" : "remove_rule",
>> audit_enabled);
>> - audit_log_end(ab);
>> + audit_log_end_local(ab, lcontext);
> Same. I'm going to stop calling these out, I think you get the idea.
>
>> @@ -2396,6 +2415,21 @@ void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
>> audit_buffer_free(ab);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * audit_log_end_local - end one audit record with local context
>> + * @ab: the audit_buffer
>> + * @context: the local context
>> + *
>> + * Emit an LSM context record if appropriate, then end the audit event
>> + * in the usual way.
>> + */
>> +void audit_log_end_local(struct audit_buffer *ab, struct audit_context *context)
>> +{
>> + audit_log_end(ab);
>> + audit_log_lsm_common(context);
>> + audit_free_local(context);
>> +}
> Eeesh, no, not this please.
>
> First, some background on audit contexts and the idea of a "local
> context" as we have been using it in the audit container ID work,
> which is where this originated. An audit context contains a few
> things, but likely the most important for this discussion is the audit
> event timestamp and serial number (I may refer to this combo as just a
> "timestamp" in the future); this timestamp/serial is shared across all
> of the audit records that make up this audit event, linking them
> together. A shared timestamp is what allows you to group an open()
> SYSCALL record with the PATH record that provides the file's pathname
> info.
>
> While there are some exceptions in the current code, most audit events
> occur as a result of a syscall, and their audit context in this case
> is the syscall's audit context (see the open() example above), but
> there are some cases being discussed where we have an audit event that
> does not occur as a result of a syscall but there is a need to group
> multiple audit records together in a single event. This is where the
> "local context" comes into play, it allows us to create an audit
> context outside of a syscall and share that context across multiple
> audit records, allowing the records to share a timestamp/serial and
> grouping them together as a single audit event in the audit stream.
>
> While a function like audit_alloc_local() make sense, there really
> shouldn't be an audit_log_end_local() function, the normal
> audit_log_end() function should be used.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
>> diff --git a/kernel/audit.h b/kernel/audit.h
>> index 27ef690afd30..5ad0c6819aa8 100644
>> --- a/kernel/audit.h
>> +++ b/kernel/audit.h
>> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ struct audit_context {
>> int dummy; /* must be the first element */
>> int in_syscall; /* 1 if task is in a syscall */
>> bool local; /* local context needed */
>> + bool lsmdone; /* multiple security reported */
> "lsmdone" doesn't seem consistent with the comment, how about
> "lsm_multi" or something similar?
>
>> enum audit_state state, current_state;
>> unsigned int serial; /* serial number for record */
>> int major; /* syscall number */
>> diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
>> index d4e061f95da8..55509faf5341 100644
>> --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
>> +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
>> @@ -1013,6 +1013,13 @@ void audit_free_context(struct audit_context *context)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_free_context);
>>
>> +void audit_free_local(struct audit_context *context)
>> +{
>> + if (context && context->local)
>> + audit_free_context(context);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_free_local);
> We don't need this function, just use audit_free_context(). A "local
> context" is the same as a non-local context; what makes a context
> "local" is the scope of the audit context (local function scope vs
> syscall scope) and nothing else.
>
>> @@ -1504,6 +1512,47 @@ static void audit_log_proctitle(void)
>> audit_log_end(ab);
>> }
>>
>> +void audit_log_lsm_common(struct audit_context *context)
>> +{
>> + struct audit_buffer *ab;
>> + struct lsmcontext lsmdata;
>> + bool sep = false;
>> + int error;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + if (!lsm_multiple_contexts() || context == NULL ||
>> + !lsmblob_is_set(&context->lsm))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + ab = audit_log_start(context, GFP_ATOMIC, AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS);
>> + if (!ab)
>> + return; /* audit_panic or being filtered */
> We should be consistent with our use of audit_panic() when we bail on
> error; we use it below, but not here - why?
>
>> + for (i = 0; i < LSMBLOB_ENTRIES; i++) {
>> + if (context->lsm.secid[i] == 0)
>> + continue;
>> + error = security_secid_to_secctx(&context->lsm, &lsmdata, i);
>> + if (error && error != -EINVAL) {
>> + audit_panic("error in audit_log_lsm");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + audit_log_format(ab, "%ssubj_%s=%s", sep ? " " : "",
>> + lsm_slot_to_name(i), lsmdata.context);
>> + sep = true;
>> + security_release_secctx(&lsmdata);
>> + }
>> + audit_log_end(ab);
>> + context->lsmdone = true;
> Maybe I missed it, but why do we need this flag?
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +void audit_log_lsm(struct audit_context *context)
>> +{
>> + if (!context->lsmdone)
>> + audit_log_lsm_common(context);
>> +}
> I think I was distracted with the local context issue and I've lost
> track of the details here, perhaps it's best to fix the local context
> issue first (that should be a big change to this patch) and then we
> can take another look.
>
>
> --
> paul moore
> www.paul-moore.com
